The Canon EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 III is a compact and lightweight 4x telephoto zoom lens ideal for shooting sports, portraits, and wildlife. This lens is compatible with full-frame and APS-C format Canon DSLRs. The optical system, construction, and exterior are the same as the EF 75-300 mm f/4-5.6 III USM. The difference is that this lens uses a DC motor instead of a USM to drive the AF.
Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III Lens
Already own this?
This item is in your gearlist!
- 75-300mm focal length
- 120-480mm equivalent focal length on Canon APS-C cameras
- F4-5.6 maximum aperture; F32-45 minimum
- Micromotor-type AF motor without full-time manual focusing
- 58mm filters
- 1.50m/59.06" minimum focus
- Canon EF mount for full frame, APS-H and APS-C DSLRs
|Lens type||Zoom lens|
|Max Format size||35mm FF|
|Focal length||75–300 mm|
|Lens mount||Canon EF|
|Maximum aperture||F4.0 - F5.6|
|Minimum aperture||F32.0 - F45.0|
|Number of diaphragm blades||7|
|Minimum focus||1.50 m (59.06″)|
|Full time manual||No|
|Focus method||Extending front|
|Weight||480 g (1.06 lb)|
|Diameter||71 mm (2.8″)|
|Length||122 mm (4.8″)|
|Materials||Plastic barrel, metal mount|
|Zoom method||Rotary (extending)|
|Filter thread||58 mm|
|Hood product code||ET-60|
|Optional accessories||Soft Case LP1019|
A good lens but
This is a very inexpensive but pretty good lens. Construction quality feels cheap - not 'nifty-fifty' cheap but not much better - but it works and that's what counts. Optically it's quite good, especially when price is considered, with good overall sharpness and low distortions except for CA. And that's the problem I have with this lens. At telephoto lengths over about 200mm CA is quite noticeable, with it rearing its ugly head in almost all high contrast shots. UGH! I think the main ...
Before reading this you must have two things in mind: 1) I'm using a DSLR for less than 1 month and 2) I am using Google Translator to help me. It is a good lens, although not having stabilizer you may need to increase the exposure time to compensate for the jitter. Problems: I took some pictures with this lens but unfortunately the first even though I noticed some chromatic aberration. After reading on the internet I found that aberration occurred only close to 300mm. But still I found it ...
Need recommendation for good sub-$500 (ish) telephoto lens
Hey all, I recently (about a month ago) picked up a Canon 60D with a Canon EF 17-40 f/4L lens from a co-worker (this is the first DSLR I've owned, so take it easy on a newbie, 'kay?). That lens has performed admirably for many of the shots that I've taken (landscapes/portraits/action shots where I'm just about in the way of the action). However, some of the shots that I've wanted to take have left me in want of something with a bit more reach (wildlife/casual sports photography) (mainly outdoor photography in decently-lit conditions, with subjects that may be moving in some cases fairly rapidly). Thus, I'm looking for a decent telephoto lens that costs under around $500 (could possibly be convinced to go up another hundred or so if it makes a huge difference). As I'd like to keep my lenses usable in a full-frame camera if/when I upgrade, I'd prefer to only get FF-compatible lenses. Some lenses that I think look promising (also, what's with the f/4-5.6 maximum aperture size? When ...
rgaiken wrote: Canon EF 75-300 F/4-5.6 III -- $170 (no IS) I can't comment on the others, but avoid this one (and the rest of the Canon 75-300 variants) like the plague. Not sharp, no IS, just not worth it even at the cheap price. None of the above applies to the Canon 70-300, which is an entirely different design. Continue Reading
I'd avoid the 75-300mm lens. It's just not good IMO. I'd get the Tamron 70-300mm as the best value. It is IMO the best 70-300mm except the Canon L which is about 3-4 times more expensive (irrelevant at this price anyway). The Tamron is sharp at 300mm f/5.6 which is an issue with most other lenses (or at least should be unless it's a defective lens). The VC is also excellent (possibly the best stabiliser IMO). IMO there isn't a better lens in this FL and price. Continue Reading
clarnibass wrote: I'd avoid the 75-300mm lens. It's just not good IMO. I'd get the Tamron 70-300mm as the best value. It is IMO the best 70-300mm except the Canon L which is about 3-4 times more expensive (irrelevant at this price anyway). The Tamron is sharp at 300mm f/5.6 which is an issue with most other lenses (or at least should be unless it's a defective lens). The VC is also excellent (possibly the best stabiliser IMO). IMO there isn't a better lens in this FL and price. Ditto. With IS (on the OP's 60D), the best choices are Cheap: EF-S 55-250 f/4-5.6 IS STM (or the prior II model) Moderate $: Tamron 70-300 f/4-5.6 Di VC USD High $: EF 70-300 f/4-5.6L IS USM, or 70-200 f/2.8L or f/4L with 1.4x, or EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS USM IMHO, YMMV Continue Reading
Have your own question?
"A Product, when delivered to you in new condition in its original container, is warranted against defects in materials or workmanship as follows: for a period of one (1) year from the date of original purchase, defective parts or a defective Product returned to Canon, or its authorized service providers, and proven to be defective upon inspection, will be repaired with new or comparable rebuilt parts or exchanged for a refurbished Product, as determined by Canon or the authorized service provider n their sole discretion. Replaced parts and exchanged Products will become the property of Canon."
Go to Canon USA's warranty page for more information. DPReview GearShop is an authorized Canon dealer in the United States.