Boasting a sensor that is 4.5x larger than a 1/1.7" sensor found in professional level point-and-shoot cameras, the PowerShot G1 X Mark II camera can produce high-quality images with a wide dynamic range. The G1 X II improves upon its predecessor in many ways. It's smaller, features a faster 24-120mm F2.0-3.9 lens (with closer focusing distances), a 31-point AF system, dual lens rings, a touchscreen LCD that can tilt upward by 180°, and Wi-Fi with NFC. While its 1.5"-type is a bit smaller than on the original, the G1 X II can shoot at 3:2 or 4:3 with the same field-of-view. The catch? No more optical viewfinder (though an EVF is optional).
Canon PowerShot G1 X Mark II Compact Camera
Already own this?
This item is in your gearlist!
“ The G1 X II produces image quality that bests nearly all compact cameras, and also offers a plethora of customizable controls, three dial operation, a tilting LCD and optical EVF, and a comprehensive Wi-Fi feature.”
- 13.1 megapixel at 4:3 / 12.8 megapixel at 3:2 aspect ratio 1.5"-type CMOS sensor
- 24-120mm equivalent F2-3.9 lens with optical image stabilizer (5x optical zoom)
- ISO 100-12800
- Dual control rings
- 3" tilting touch LCD with 1,040,000 dots
- 1080/30p HD video
- Optional electronic viewfinder with 2,360,000 dots (sold separately)
- Raw and Raw+JPEG shooting
- SD/SDHC/SDXC memory
- Built-in Wi-Fi, NFC, and GPS
|Body type||Large sensor compact|
|Max resolution||4160 x 3120|
|Other resolutions||4352 x 2904, 4352 x 2448, 3120 x 3120, 2496 x 3120, 3072 x 2304, 3072 x 2048, 3072 x 1728, 2304 x 2304, 1840 x 2304, 2048 x 1536, 2048 x 1368, 1920 x 1080, 1536 x 1536, 1232 x 1536|
|Image ratio w:h||1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2, 16:9|
|Effective pixels||13 megapixels|
|Sensor photo detectors||15 megapixels|
|Sensor size||1.5″ (18.7 x 14 mm)|
|White balance presets||8|
|Custom white balance||Yes (2 Custom settings)|
|JPEG quality levels||Superfine, fine|
|Optics & Focus|
|Focal length (equiv.)||24–120 mm|
|Maximum aperture||F2.0 - F3.9|
|Digital zoom||Yes (4X)|
|Normal focus range||5 cm (1.97″)|
|Macro focus range||5 cm (1.97″)|
|Number of focus points||31|
|Screen / viewfinder|
|Touch screen||Yes (Capacitive)|
|Screen type||sRGB PureColor II Touchscreen LCD|
|Viewfinder type||Electronic (optional)|
|Minimum shutter speed||60 sec|
|Maximum shutter speed||1/4000 sec|
|Manual exposure mode||Yes|
|Subject / scene modes||Yes|
|Flash range||6.80 m|
|Flash modes||Auto, On, Slow Synchro, Off|
|Continuous drive||5 fps|
|Self-timer||Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom)|
|Exposure compensation||±3 (at 1/3 EV steps)|
|Resolutions||1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)|
|Videography notes||Star Time-Lapse: 1920 x 1080 (15 or 30 fps), Digest Movie: 1280 x 720 (30 fps), Minature Effect: 1280 x 720 or 640 x 480 (1.5 - 6 fps)|
|USB||USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)|
|Wireless notes||with NFC|
|Battery description||NB-12L lithium-ion battery and charger|
|Battery Life (CIPA)||240|
|Weight (inc. batteries)||553 g (1.22 lb / 19.51 oz)|
|Dimensions||116 x 74 x 66 mm (4.57 x 2.91 x 2.6″)|
The G1 X II's large sensor and fast, wide-ranging lens make for a large camera. Despite that, Canon has designed the camera in such a way that it can be operated with one hand - though the front dials encourage a two-handed approach.
The design of the G1 X II has changed considerably compared to its predecessor. Gone is the 'two level' top plate - used to house the optical finder - which gives the G1 X II a more traditional rectangular shape. The grip on the G1 X II is smaller than on the original, though the optional 'custom grip' closes the gap. Also note that the front dial on the G1 X is gone on the G1 X II, replaced instead by an additional dial around the lens.
The lens is longer (24-120mm) and faster (F2.0-3.9), and the latter makes the camera pretty compelling when you throw in its 1.5"-type sensor. The autofocus system is much faster according to Canon, and you can finally focus on something remotely close to the camera (5cm).
Scoring is relative only to the other cameras in the same category at the time of review.
|Ergonomics & handling||
|Metering & focus accuracy||
|Image quality (raw)||
|Image quality (jpeg)||
|Low light / high ISO performance||
|Viewfinder / screen rating||
|Movie / video mode||
The PowerShot G1 X Mark II is an enthusiast compact whose fast lens and large sensor allow it to produce impressive photos in both bright and low light. Its well-built body offers three dials, and numerous controls can be customized. That said, there are numerous improvements that could be made, especially in terms of dynamic range and responsiveness.
Those desiring a flexible compact camera that's even good for portrait photography.
Not So Good For
Photographers who demand wide dynamic range. Auto/Program mode shooters. Videographers.
Its amazing gadget by Canon
Great all-rounder with focusing issues
I like the camera as it is except for several issues: The standard grip is not designed for the weight of the camera. Since the camera is heavier than most compacts, I unintentionally press camera controls and it is somewhat annoying. The optional grip is way too expensive. So I'd rather keep nagging around than buy this grip. I don't want to invest my money in this Canon's carefully designed marketing rip-off (larger grip should cost some 5 cent more in production). The other issue that ...
cool lens and iso capability
I have the G1X2 and also the RX100. The new G1X has a nice thumb grip to hold it better. The speed of all functions is very good, right there with the RX. The lens is sharp at the long end even at 3.9, and best at 5.6. At the wide end its typical wide open, a bit soft as experienced photogs might expect, but mostly at very close shooting distances. For the street at dusk, I won't worry about it. Not that bad. If 2.8 is enough light, that's of course better at 24mm. At 6400 iso it ...
Only an incremental improvement from basic PowerShot
I am a middling enthusiast who only buys a camera every three years... so my previous camera was the SX130, a very capable machine! After intensive studying of dpreview, I lighted on the new G1X Mark II. It's a great camera! Its behavior in low-light is excellent, and the AF speed is tremendously improved, the WiFi is cool, all factors in my purchase. But my expectations of IQ were far too high. I figured that three years from now (when I buy my next camera) a 1.5" sensor will be common, ...
250D misuse on my G1X-II; skewing perception?
I've posted a few photos taken with my G1X-II comparing shots taken with and without my 250D. I figured out pretty quickly that the 250D gives a noticeable improvement in magnification at the telephoto end of the zoom range on this camera, but not much improvement at the wide end thanks to the Mk II's improved MFD over its predecessor. I also mentioned more than once that I seemed to get much clearer shots without the 250D than with. As I've seen my own photos, I don't think the trade-off in IQ is worth the increased magnification. Each time I've posted samples like this, I've clearly stated that I do not have the filter adapter for the Mk II and have been holding the 250D against the front of the lens by hand (250D glass in direct contact with the plastic front rim of the G1X-II lens). I realize the filter adapter would actually hold the 250D slightly away from the front of the lens, and would certainly do so at a constant distance. My question is whether my hand-held method is ...
Your handholding of a lens element is almost certainly always out of alignment. The proximity of the 250D glass to your G1 X II front element is also probably causing some bizarre reflection or color issues (especially considering how misaligned you are). I don't understand why you're not using the adapter. Of course what you're doing is affecting image quality in your macro shots. If the focus plane of your 250D is slightly off (which it is without using the adapter) who knows what bizarre effects could occur between it and the sensor as light goes from one lens element to the next. If you've got IS switched on and the 250D is not perfectly stable then even that could cause vibration in the IS as it tries to compensate. After spending around a grand for a camera and close up lens why would you avoid spending $30 for an adapter? Continue Reading
[[My question is whether my hand-held method is contributing to the reduced IQ.]] It would be difficult, if not impossible, to answer this without a corresponding test using your camera and your subject matter with the adapter. When it comes to macro-photography, given the shallow depth of field, very slight movements will cause all sorts of problems. Continue Reading
Thanks for the thoughtful responses. What you have suggested makes sense to me. To answer the question about why I have not purchased the adapter, this was not a matter of the cost, but of wanting to wait until a third party version became available made out of actual metal instead of plastic. I'm not sure why I'm so leary of the plastic adapters, considering both the 250D and the lens mount are plastic. Maybe I'll try either the Canon or the JJC and see how much improvemetn I get, plus I would then be able to use my other 58 mm filters. Dan Continue Reading
Max Zoom RX100 III vs G1X II
Would it be correct to say that the max zoom capability of the RX100 III is roughly the same as the G1X II - even though the G1X II has a max focal length of 120mm vs the RX100 III's 70mm, because the RX100 III has a 20mp sensor vs. the G1X II's 13mp? In other words, if I took a picture of the moon at maximum optical zoom with both cameras, it would occupy roughly the same number of pixels?
Thanks for that explanation! Indeed the pixels on the Sony are smaller - but they are on a BSI sensor which means the difference wouldn't be that big. So really, as you said, you have only a little less zoom but a LOT less baggage! Continue Reading
I agree, the basic IQ of rx100 is terrific, BUT, it's not for real zoom. I have had mine for 1-1/2 years, it's wonderful, but it is just at the beginning of zoom at 100, m3 at 70mm is considered not enough for portraits for some. You can get some great crops from it, and jpeg only clear image zoom is what I call 'good enough', but, not for zoom of far away objects , and certainly not for shooting far away objects and cropping later. m3 constant f2.8 is nice, but that doesn't mean you aren't going to be in high iso territory , the larger sensor G1X samples I have seen are superior at high ISO for near shots, and I would think superior for far low light shots too. and, if you are close, and want more DOF, you will need to set a smaller aperture than f2.8, giving different results. Continue Reading
Sony sensor is superior...they have continued to improve while Canon has chosen to go slow and steady. The G1X II is a great camera, had it come out in that version in the G1X, but things have progressed and the market is moving forward. its up to each individual consumer to decide how much zoom they really need. You can get a program to run analysis as to the focal points of all your shots. After doing this, most people are surprised to find the bulk between 24mm - 70mm. For rare situations when zoom is more needed, cropping comes in handy. Far better than carrying an extra bulky camera around. Continue Reading
G1X II good for macro?
I'm in the market for a point-and-shoot that takes good close-ups of fairly small objects at night. I used a Canon SX110IS for several years, and while it took some pretty good nighttime close-ups ( e.g. ), I want an upgrade. Reviewers universally love the Sony RX100II, so I got one last year, but I hate its macro. It only seems to work if you're zoomed completely out and then get to within 1-2 cm of the object. This is problem if you're using the flash (the lens blocks the flash), or if you don't want to be that close . Maybe I just don't know what I'm doing, but I'm ready to give up and get a different camera with friendlier macro. One of the things that I loved about my old Canon is that on macro it gave a minimum focal distance in cm for any given zoom (sony doesn't). Does the G1X II give minimum focal distance in actual distances? What are people's experiences with macro on this camera?
It was just discussed here: http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3693283 Continue Reading
The G1XMII allows close focusing when the camera is zoomed out to 24mm. So, it does not really do macro photography without an adapter. Also rather depends on what you mean by "small". If you are talking about very small things like hover flies, you will have a problem, I think. Macro is best done with a lot of light. This allows the aperture to be small, thus more sharply focusing the light, and the ISO to be low, resulting in less noise. By definition, Macro photography means that the image on the film/sensor is the same size (or larger) as the object being photographed.* It is difficult, and expensive, to do this on a zoom lens. Most manufactures have bent the definition to mean getting close with the camera. But, since it is more easily accomplished at wide angle (zoomed out), the image on the sensor will still be small. *Some looser definitions allow 1/2 size. Continue Reading
Have your own question?
"Canon U.S.A., Inc. and Canon Canada Inc. (collectively "Canon") warrant to the original end‐user purchaser, when delivered in new condition in its original container, that the Product will be free from defects in materials and workmanship under normal use and service for a period of one (1) year from the date of original purchase. Product returned to a Canon repair facility and proven to be defective upon inspection will, at Canon’s sole discretion and without charge, be (a) repaired utilizing new, remanufactured, repaired and/or recycled parts; (b) exchanged for a new Product or; (c) exchanged for a refurbished Product, as determined by the Canon repair facility. Warranty exchange or replacement does not extend the original warranty period of the Product. "
Go to Canon USA's warranty page for more information. DPReview GearShop is an authorized Canon dealer in the United States.