Reviving the spirit of its beloved OM film series of SLRs, Olympus introduced the O-MD E-M5 in early 2012. This 16.1MP Micro Four Thirds system camera boasts 1080 60i Full HD video, an articulated 3.0 touch display and a built-in 1.44 million-dot electronic viewfinder. Fit and finish are excellent, in keeping with the camera's retro styling, and the robust camera body is weather sealed to protect from dust and water damage. The E-M5's JPEG output is impressive, and the camera's Raw shooting capability will satisfy shooters who want more control over image processing. With a wide range of affordable, fast lenses in the Micro Four Thirds lineup the O-MD E-M5 is capable of making great images in even the most challenging lighting conditions. Despite its compact size, a twin dial control and a handful of customizable buttons make it easy and comfortable to use.
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mirrorless Camera
Already own this?
This item is in your gearlist!
“ The E-M5 sets a new benchmark for Micro Four Thirds images, producing good results in all but the most challenging of situations.”
- 16.1MP CMOS Micro Four Thirds sensor
- 9 frames per second continuous shooting
- 35-area contrast detect AF
- ISO 200-25,600
- 1080 HD video
- Articulated 3.0 inch touchscreen LCD with 610,000 dots
- Electronic viewfinder with 1,440,000 dots
- Raw and Raw + JPEG shooting
- Flash hot shoe and Olympus Wireless RC Flash system compatible
- Weather-sealed body
- SD/SDHC/SDXC card slot
|Body type||SLR-style mirrorless|
|Max resolution||4608 x 3456|
|Other resolutions||4608 x 3072, 4608 x 2592, 3456 x 3456, 2592 x 3456, 3200 x 2400, 3200 x 1800, 3216 x 2144, 2400 x 2400, 1824 x 2432, 2560 x1920, 2560 x 1440, 2544 x 1696, 1920 x 1920, 1440 x 1920, 1920 x 1440, 1920 x 1080, 1920 x 1280, 1440 x 1440, 1104 x 1472, 1600 x 1200, 1536 x 864, 1584 x 1056, 1216 x 1216, 864 x 1152, 1280 x 960, 1280 x 720, 1296 x 864, 960 x 960, 720 x 960, 1024 x 768, 1024 x 576, 1008 x 672, 768 x 768, 576 x 768, 640 x 480, 640 x 360, 624 x 416, 480 x 480, 384 x 512|
|Image ratio w:h||1:1, 4:3, 3:2, 16:9|
|Effective pixels||16 megapixels|
|Sensor photo detectors||17 megapixels|
|Sensor size||Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm)|
|ISO||Auto (200 - 25600), 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200, 6400, 12800, 25600|
|White balance presets||12|
|Custom white balance||Yes (1)|
|Optics & Focus|
|Manual focus||Yes (Live view image is magnified when the focus ring is rotated. (at S-AF+MF or MF mode))|
|Number of focus points||35|
|Lens mount||Micro Four Thirds|
|Focal length multiplier||2×|
|Screen / viewfinder|
|Screen type||Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor|
|Minimum shutter speed||60 sec|
|Maximum shutter speed||1/4000 sec|
|Manual exposure mode||Yes|
|Subject / scene modes||Yes|
|External flash||Yes (via Hot-shoe (FL-50/FL-50R, FL-36/FL-36R, FL-20, FL-14, FL-300R, FL-600R))|
|Flash modes||Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels)|
|Continuous drive||9.0 fps|
|Self-timer||Yes (2 or 12 sec)|
|Exposure compensation||±3 (at 1/3 EV, 1/2 EV, 1 EV steps)|
|AE Bracketing||(2, 3, 5, 7 frames at 1/3 EV, 1/2 EV, 2/3 EV, 1 EV steps)|
|WB Bracketing||Yes (3 frames in 2, 4, 6 steps selectable in either blue/amber or magenta/green axis)|
|Resolutions||1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)|
|Format||H.264, Motion JPEG|
|USB||USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)|
|HDMI||Yes (Mini HDMI type-D)|
|Remote control||Yes (Optional (RM-UC1))|
|Battery description||Lithium-Ion BLN-1 rechargeable battery & charger|
|Weight (inc. batteries)||425 g (0.94 lb / 14.99 oz)|
|Dimensions||122 x 89 x 43 mm (4.8 x 3.5 x 1.69″)|
Scoring is relative only to the other cameras in the same category at the time of review.
|Ergonomics & handling||
|Metering & focus accuracy||
|Image quality (raw)||
|Image quality (jpeg)||
|Low light / high ISO performance||
|Viewfinder / screen rating||
|Movie / video mode||
The Olympus OM-D E-M5 is certainly the most capable Micro Four Thirds camera we've reviewed and arguably the most likeable mirrorless model yet. It falls down a little bit on its continuous focusing but we have absolutely no complaints about the image quality. It's small, attractive, and a pleasure to use, and its pictures are equally enjoyable.
A wide variety of photography, particularly if you spend the time configuring it to your needs.
Not So Good For
I'm in love
OK, all of this is quite subjective, so take it for what it is. That out of the way, I've never been happier with a camera. Quite a few years ago, I thought Olympus was on to something with their 4/3 camera system: small (properly proportioned) sensor means small body and lens, and when they came out with in-camera image stabilization in the e-510 I was interested enough to buy in. It was a pretty nice camera, easy to shoot with, but not the greatest high ISO IQ, nor the best autofocus in ...
Good IQ, but horrible ergonomics and unreliable AF, overpriced
I used the OM-D E-M5 for a time now and decided to send it back. Why? There are several reasons that make the high price-tag questionable. Yes, the IQ is very good. I was impressed with the high-detailled and vivid coloured photos. And the high-ISO noise performance is impressive for a 4/3 sensor. However I found AWB horribly unreliable. Shooting under fluorescent light gave me yellowish pictures - I shot RAW but this bothers me with extra work in PP that shouldn´t be necessary. My old GH1 ...
Best 4/3 without a doubt, very minor cons
I own the Panasonic GF1, Olympus EP-3 and the Panasonic GX1, and several prime lenses. While the lenses have gotten really good, I felt the M4/3 format was not really progressing much after its early promise, both the EP-3 and the GX1 were disappointing to me. This camera finally delivers on this promise and in my opinion is the perfect M4/3 body in almost every way. PROS: The censor's overall and high iso performance, really great manual controls (love the two top dials), almost complete ...
Best camera in the entire universe.
If you had asked me to buy another olympus camera after the E3 fiasco I would have told you to bog off. This little wonder is so good I have sold my entire collection of Nikons and all other cameras. I just stopped using them as they were very heavy. Olympus have shown just a glimpse of what the future holds for people who photograph for pleasure. They held nothing back with this camera and even included art filters for those of us who hate photoshop. The image stabilisation is better than ...
Other Videos About this Product
5-Axis Image Stabilization by Olympus
Featured in this video
Anybody else like to see 25 fps in video on OMD EM5?
and 50 and 24 and 60 too, why not its madness. Also, up the flaming bit rate Olympus, what's the deal? its not like your paying for the sd cards or storage, 50mbits 1080p 50 would make this cam beyond awesome. My thoughts? 720p50/60 @ 22 and 42mb 1080p/24 at 24 or 28, and 48mb 1080p/25 at 24 or 28, and 48mb 1080p/30p at 28 and 48mb 1080p 50/60 @28 and 50mb Just let us dial them in Oly, what's the flaming deal. Continue Reading
Yes, I think it's a shame that Olympus totally ignore PAL countries. 24p should be present too! All other brands (Panasonic, Sony, Canon, Nikon, Pentax,...) have 24p in their flagship cameras and sometimes lesser models too... Only Olympus seems to ignore it totally! I think it's a real shame, because the EM-5 would be an ideal camera for video with its superb IBIS. If the bitrate could be increase d to 23 Mbps or more, it would be even better... Well, at least, we have the GH-2 and GH-3 :-) Continue Reading
Which Camera...Nikon D5300, D7100, Olympus OM-D EM-10, OM-D E-M5?
I'm looking for a versatile beginnerish camera as you can clearly infer by my price range. With that being said my main interests lie mostly in street photography, but some scenary, and close-mid range shots of still-nature would be nice as well. I really enjoy the feel of the D5300, while I tend to think the D7100 is a tad clunkier, which I think I could get used to. On the other hand, the OM-D EM-5 feels nice with the extra grip, but the OM-D EM-10, while I haven't held it with an external grip, feels a bit miniature in my hands. I really can't get this DSLR vs Mirrorless battle out of my head even though I shouldn't let it distract me so much from diving into another piece of equipment (Although I definitely have some more valid reasons, for example below) I've probably looked at all of the pros and cons to each in the book, but can't seem to come to a decision. I had a Nikon D5000 a couple years back until it was stolen from me, but I didn't collect a lot of lenses, so I began ...
If you don't mind putting up with the weight then D7100. Continue Reading
Hi. As DSLR user it´s not easy to help on mirrorless. Only fair thing I can say is that both designs have it´s advantages so it´s hard to decide anyway. There are things I´d love to have on my DSLR from mirrorless, there are many things I´d like to see on mirrorless (so I could finally buy it), and there are things I hate on both DSLRs and Mirrorless. That´s just.... Life! :-) For DSLR I believe D5300 should work sufficiently for your decision of cam, so you learn about new technologies and techniques and workflow. You have to find what you like anyway, and for that you need to pay money and buy pretty "any" cam. D5300 is very good representation to realize If you like DSLRs or not, and If you need better body or not. I believe Mirrorless cam are not worth image quality/price wise, but those are excellent refined devices with very stretched/advanced functionality, so it´s often more easy to work with it and take that shot. (Tad better) IQ (of DSLRs for that price) itself does not ... Continue Reading
From NEX 7 to OMD EM5
Hello to all, I was just wondering if any of you on this forum have switched from the nex7 to the OMD EM5? I am currently thinking of going this direction and would like your taughts. My main reasons for making the switch are: Faster autofocus Better lens selection I also feel that the OMD options are just more complete then the NEX7, more customizable buttons, battery grip, wireless flash options. My lens options would be Panasonic 12-35 2.8, Leica 25 1.4 and probably the 14-150. I think these lenses would pretty much cover all the situations i may need. I currently own the SEL 18-200 and some legacy lens. Thank you in advance.
I have both. My Nex7 has the Zeiss 24 on it. My EM-5 has the kit zoom and the 45 f1.8. What i can tell you is that: 1. The EM-5 is much, much faster focussing. 2. The EM-5 has a more accurate AF. 3. The EM-5 performs better in low light AF. 4. The EM-5 is more customisable. 5. Better range of glass. What noone else will tell you is: 1. The Nex 7 is signifigantly easier to handle. 2. The Nex 7 is much more ergonomic. 3. you can easily handle & shoot the Nex 7 in M ONE-HANDED. 4. Focus Peaking is superior and more reliable than EM-5 low light AF. 5. The Nex 7 with Zeis is a bit bigger than the EM-5 with 45 f1.8 but is lighter than the EM-5 6. Compared to the Nex7, the EM-5 UI and settings is a terrible, terrible disaster. Look at how many people owning EM-5 are still trying to figure out how to do basic settings. It took me days to set up my Em-5 and I took shortcuts simply because I got tired of fighting the mess of UI. 7. The EM-5 controls require 2 handed operation at all times ... Continue Reading
Wansai, You made some valid points about the weakness in the E-M5's ergonomics. However I think you might have exaggerated that as a weakness due to the way you hold the camera, single handed and with your right hand supporting the camera and also pushing various buttons. I know many photographers nowadays use the same hold, but there is a better way, especially when using the E-M5. The OMD E-M5 is shaped exactly like an old OM SLR film camera. In those days, it's common to use this hold. The left hand suports all the weight of the camera, palm facing up, and fingers holding the lens barrel to focus or zoom. Many pros still use this hold especilaly with long lenses. The left elbow and arm are pressed against the chest for steadiness. You see, there was no IS in those days, and ASA (or ISO) 400 was the limit before unacceptable grain (noise) appeared. Handholding a camera steadily was a much more important technique then nowadays, given the slow shutter speeds that had to be used ... Continue Reading
Agree, unless you add the grip to the E-M5. The Panny G5 is easier than both. True if you don't buy the optional grip. I'm not sure about this - it isn't just weight but size and weight distribution that is a problem. Disagree, MF is only more accurate if you magnify, but you can do that on the E-M5 But the weight in that combination (NEX/Zeiss) is in the glass in the lens so it is a bit unbalanced. LOL. HAHAHAHAHA. Are you serious? The E-M5 UI is streets ahead of the NEX. I swear Sony deployed the Lotus Notes programming team on its UI. What? Why? I don't do this all the time. The power switch isn't great but it isn't this bad. If you wear the camera on a neck strap it's fine. Never had this, did used to hit the video button on NEX all the time. Conversely, this is big problem with the Panny G5. I don't find it a problem with the E-M5 Are your fingers matchsticks or something? The NEX-7 is a thunk the E-M5 is more of a click. If this bothers you get a G5 and use the electronic shutter. Continue Reading