Reviving the spirit of its beloved OM film series of SLRs, Olympus introduced the O-MD E-M5 in early 2012. This 16.1MP Micro Four Thirds system camera boasts 1080 60i Full HD video, an articulated 3.0 touch display and a built-in 1.44 million-dot electronic viewfinder. Fit and finish are excellent, in keeping with the camera's retro styling, and the robust camera body is weather sealed to protect from dust and water damage. The E-M5's JPEG output is impressive, and the camera's Raw shooting capability will satisfy shooters who want more control over image processing. With a wide range of affordable, fast lenses in the Micro Four Thirds lineup the O-MD E-M5 is capable of making great images in even the most challenging lighting conditions. Despite its compact size, a twin dial control and a handful of customizable buttons make it easy and comfortable to use.
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mirrorless Camera
Already own this?
This item is in your gearlist!
“ The E-M5 sets a new benchmark for Micro Four Thirds images, producing good results in all but the most challenging of situations.”
- 16.1MP CMOS Micro Four Thirds sensor
- 9 frames per second continuous shooting
- 35-area contrast detect AF
- ISO 200-25,600
- 1080 HD video
- Articulated 3.0 inch touchscreen LCD with 610,000 dots
- Electronic viewfinder with 1,440,000 dots
- Raw and Raw + JPEG shooting
- Flash hot shoe and Olympus Wireless RC Flash system compatible
- Weather-sealed body
- SD/SDHC/SDXC card slot
|Body type||SLR-style mirrorless|
|Max resolution||4608 x 3456|
|Other resolutions||4608 x 3072, 4608 x 2592, 3456 x 3456, 2592 x 3456, 3200 x 2400, 3200 x 1800, 3216 x 2144, 2400 x 2400, 1824 x 2432, 2560 x1920, 2560 x 1440, 2544 x 1696, 1920 x 1920, 1440 x 1920, 1920 x 1440, 1920 x 1080, 1920 x 1280, 1440 x 1440, 1104 x 1472, 1600 x 1200, 1536 x 864, 1584 x 1056, 1216 x 1216, 864 x 1152, 1280 x 960, 1280 x 720, 1296 x 864, 960 x 960, 720 x 960, 1024 x 768, 1024 x 576, 1008 x 672, 768 x 768, 576 x 768, 640 x 480, 640 x 360, 624 x 416, 480 x 480, 384 x 512|
|Image ratio w:h||1:1, 4:3, 3:2, 16:9|
|Effective pixels||16 megapixels|
|Sensor photo detectors||17 megapixels|
|Sensor size||Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm)|
|ISO||Auto (200 - 25600), 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200, 6400, 12800, 25600|
|White balance presets||12|
|Custom white balance||Yes (1)|
|Optics & Focus|
|Manual focus||Yes (Live view image is magnified when the focus ring is rotated. (at S-AF+MF or MF mode))|
|Number of focus points||35|
|Lens mount||Micro Four Thirds|
|Focal length multiplier||2×|
|Screen / viewfinder|
|Screen type||Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor|
|Minimum shutter speed||60 sec|
|Maximum shutter speed||1/4000 sec|
|Manual exposure mode||Yes|
|Subject / scene modes||Yes|
|External flash||Yes (via Hot-shoe (FL-50/FL-50R, FL-36/FL-36R, FL-20, FL-14, FL-300R, FL-600R))|
|Flash modes||Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels)|
|Continuous drive||9 fps|
|Self-timer||Yes (2 or 12 sec)|
|Exposure compensation||±3 (at 1/3 EV, 1/2 EV, 1 EV steps)|
|AE Bracketing||(2, 3, 5, 7 frames at 1/3 EV, 1/2 EV, 2/3 EV, 1 EV steps)|
|WB Bracketing||Yes (3 frames in 2, 4, 6 steps selectable in either blue/amber or magenta/green axis)|
|Resolutions||1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)|
|Format||H.264, Motion JPEG|
|USB||USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)|
|HDMI||Yes (Mini HDMI type-D)|
|Remote control||Yes (Optional (RM-UC1))|
|Battery description||Lithium-Ion BLN-1 rechargeable battery & charger|
|Weight (inc. batteries)||425 g (0.94 lb / 14.99 oz)|
|Dimensions||122 x 89 x 43 mm (4.8 x 3.5 x 1.69″)|
Scoring is relative only to the other cameras in the same category at the time of review.
|Ergonomics & handling||
|Metering & focus accuracy||
|Image quality (raw)||
|Image quality (jpeg)||
|Low light / high ISO performance||
|Viewfinder / screen rating||
|Movie / video mode||
The Olympus OM-D E-M5 is certainly the most capable Micro Four Thirds camera we've reviewed and arguably the most likeable mirrorless model yet. It falls down a little bit on its continuous focusing but we have no absolutely no complaints about the image quality. It's small, attractive and a pleasure to use, and its pictures are equally enjoyable.
A wide variety of photography, particularly if you spend the time configuring it to your needs.
Not So Good For
Photography of moving subjects - the only area where it falls significantly behind a good DSLR.
I'm in love
OK, all of this is quite subjective, so take it for what it is. That out of the way, I've never been happier with a camera. Quite a few years ago, I thought Olympus was on to something with their 4/3 camera system: small (properly proportioned) sensor means small body and lens, and when they came out with in-camera image stabilization in the e-510 I was interested enough to buy in. It was a pretty nice camera, easy to shoot with, but not the greatest high ISO IQ, nor the best autofocus in ...
Good IQ, but horrible ergonomics and unreliable AF, overpriced
I used the OM-D E-M5 for a time now and decided to send it back. Why? There are several reasons that make the high price-tag questionable. Yes, the IQ is very good. I was impressed with the high-detailled and vivid coloured photos. And the high-ISO noise performance is impressive for a 4/3 sensor. However I found AWB horribly unreliable. Shooting under fluorescent light gave me yellowish pictures - I shot RAW but this bothers me with extra work in PP that shouldn´t be necessary. My old GH1 ...
Best 4/3 without a doubt, very minor cons
I own the Panasonic GF1, Olympus EP-3 and the Panasonic GX1, and several prime lenses. While the lenses have gotten really good, I felt the M4/3 format was not really progressing much after its early promise, both the EP-3 and the GX1 were disappointing to me. This camera finally delivers on this promise and in my opinion is the perfect M4/3 body in almost every way. PROS: The censor's overall and high iso performance, really great manual controls (love the two top dials), almost complete ...
Best camera in the entire universe.
If you had asked me to buy another olympus camera after the E3 fiasco I would have told you to bog off. This little wonder is so good I have sold my entire collection of Nikons and all other cameras. I just stopped using them as they were very heavy. Olympus have shown just a glimpse of what the future holds for people who photograph for pleasure. They held nothing back with this camera and even included art filters for those of us who hate photoshop. The image stabilisation is better than ...
Other Videos About this Product
5-Axis Image Stabilization by Olympus
Featured in this video
Anybody else like to see 25 fps in video on OMD EM5?
and 50 and 24 and 60 too, why not its madness. Also, up the flaming bit rate Olympus, what's the deal? its not like your paying for the sd cards or storage, 50mbits 1080p 50 would make this cam beyond awesome. My thoughts? 720p50/60 @ 22 and 42mb 1080p/24 at 24 or 28, and 48mb 1080p/25 at 24 or 28, and 48mb 1080p/30p at 28 and 48mb 1080p 50/60 @28 and 50mb Just let us dial them in Oly, what's the flaming deal. Continue Reading
Yes, I think it's a shame that Olympus totally ignore PAL countries. 24p should be present too! All other brands (Panasonic, Sony, Canon, Nikon, Pentax,...) have 24p in their flagship cameras and sometimes lesser models too... Only Olympus seems to ignore it totally! I think it's a real shame, because the EM-5 would be an ideal camera for video with its superb IBIS. If the bitrate could be increase d to 23 Mbps or more, it would be even better... Well, at least, we have the GH-2 and GH-3 :-) Continue Reading
Which is better value, E-M5 or E-M10?
I'm looking for a camera for travel photography and landscapes, and have decided on an OM-D camera. My question is which is the better choice given the price, £700 for the E-M10 and 14-42mm kit lens as opposed to ~£850 for the E-M5 with 12-50mm kit lens (and an Olympus promotion for a free 45mm 1.8 lens and HLD-6 grip). I'm edging towards the E-M5 due to the extra lens and grip offer, but is that a good enough reason to buy a 2 year old camera? Thanks Lee
If you're travelling it rains sometimes, and the weather-sealed E-M5 and ditto 12-50 lens won't be hurt by some water. The 12-50 is not too bad and very versatile and I have found that it is a very good travel companion. I have used that combination a lot when travelling, with very good result most of the time. If you can get the E-M5 with 12-50 plus grip and the excellent 45/1,8 for the price you mentioned I think it's the best value. Continue Reading
Just a quick question, not trying to hijack the topic. If both cameras were priced exactly the same (body only) and weather sealing is not important to the buyer (due to having no weather sealed lenses), is there any reason to even consider buying the E-M5? Continue Reading
There is just you on one side, and the whole of a major organisation marketing dept on the other side. You can be VERY clear that there NEITHER is better value! If one was better value, then the price would have been set differently (and be reset if required) very quickly. So the question is NOT "which is better value?" but "Which is better value FOR ME?" And that will depend on what you want the camera for? What type of pictures do you take? How can you take more? How can you take better pictures? One way of answering the Q for you is to think about: Who are you going to tell that you have just spent $700-$1000 on a camera? Which camera do you want to describe to them? What are they going to say in response? And: "Take a look at these pictures that I took with my new camera": Will you be happy promoting the camera you used to take the pictures? Continue Reading
From NEX 7 to OMD EM5
Hello to all, I was just wondering if any of you on this forum have switched from the nex7 to the OMD EM5? I am currently thinking of going this direction and would like your taughts. My main reasons for making the switch are: Faster autofocus Better lens selection I also feel that the OMD options are just more complete then the NEX7, more customizable buttons, battery grip, wireless flash options. My lens options would be Panasonic 12-35 2.8, Leica 25 1.4 and probably the 14-150. I think these lenses would pretty much cover all the situations i may need. I currently own the SEL 18-200 and some legacy lens. Thank you in advance.
awmenard wrote: Hello to all, I was just wondering if any of you on this forum have switched from the nex7 to the OMD EM5? I am currently thinking of going this direction and would like your taughts. My main reasons for making the switch are: Faster autofocus Better lens selection I also feel that the OMD options are just more complete then the NEX7, more customizable buttons, battery grip, wireless flash options. My lens options would be Panasonic 12-35 2.8, Leica 25 1.4 and probably the 14-150. I think these lenses would pretty much cover all the situations i may need. I currently own the SEL 18-200 and some legacy lens. Thank you in advance. I have both. My Nex7 has the Zeiss 24 on it. My EM-5 has the kit zoom and the 45 f1.8. What i can tell you is that: 1. The EM-5 is much, much faster focussing. 2. The EM-5 has a more accurate AF. 3. The EM-5 performs better in low light AF. 4. The EM-5 is more customisable. 5. Better range of glass. What noone else will tell you is: 1. The ... Continue Reading
Wansai, You made some valid points about the weakness in the E-M5's ergonomics. However I think you might have exaggerated that as a weakness due to the way you hold the camera, single handed and with your right hand supporting the camera and also pushing various buttons. I know many photographers nowadays use the same hold, but there is a better way, especially when using the E-M5. The OMD E-M5 is shaped exactly like an old OM SLR film camera. In those days, it's common to use this hold. The left hand suports all the weight of the camera, palm facing up, and fingers holding the lens barrel to focus or zoom. Many pros still use this hold especilaly with long lenses. The left elbow and arm are pressed against the chest for steadiness. You see, there was no IS in those days, and ASA (or ISO) 400 was the limit before unacceptable grain (noise) appeared. Handholding a camera steadily was a much more important technique then nowadays, given the slow shutter speeds that had to be used ... Continue Reading
wansai wrote: What noone else will tell you is: 1. The Nex 7 is signifigantly easier to handle. Agree, unless you add the grip to the E-M5. The Panny G5 is easier than both. 2. The Nex 7 is much more ergonomic. True if you don't buy the optional grip. 3. you can easily handle & shoot the Nex 7 in M ONE-HANDED. I'm not sure about this - it isn't just weight but size and weight distribution that is a problem. 4. Focus Peaking is superior and more reliable than EM-5 low light AF. Disagree, MF is only more accurate if you magnify, but you can do that on the E-M5 5. The Nex 7 with Zeis is a bit bigger than the EM-5 with 45 f1.8 but is lighter than the EM-5 But the weight in that combination (NEX/Zeiss) is in the glass in the lens so it is a bit unbalanced. 6. Compared to the Nex7, the EM-5 UI and settings is a terrible, terrible disaster. Look at how many people owning EM-5 are still trying to figure out how to do basic settings. It took me days to set up my Em-5 and I took shortcuts ... Continue Reading