The Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 is a superzoom camera that features a 1"-type, 20.1 megapixel CMOS sensor along with an F2.8-4.0 25-400mm lens. The lens uses Depth from Defocus technology, which allows extremely fast autofocus speeds, according to Panasonic. The FZ1000 is powered by the same quad-core Venus Engine processor used by the DMC-GH4, which not only allows for fast performance, but also 4K video recording at 30fps. Photos can be composed on a 3" fully articulating 921k dot or an OLED electronic viewfinder with 2.4 million dots. The FZ1000 also has built-in Wi-Fi with NFC for easy photo sharing via your smartphone.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 4K QFHD/HD 16X Long Zoom Digital Camera (Black)
Already own this?
This item is in your gearlist!
“ For those looking for a superzoom camera that excels at both photo and video quality, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 delivers.”
- Fast F2.8 lens up to 400mm equiv.
- 20.1 megapixel 1" sensor
- 4K video capture at 30p
- 3-inch fully-articulated LCD
- Wi-Fi with NFC
|Body type||SLR-like (bridge)|
|Max resolution||5472 x 3648|
|Other resolutions||4864x3648, 5472x3080, 3648x3648, 3888x2592, 3456x2592, 3840x2160, 2592x2592, 2736x1824, 2736x1824, 2432x1824, 1824x1824, 1920x1080|
|Image ratio w:h||1:1, 4:3, 3:2, 16:9|
|Effective pixels||20 megapixels|
|Sensor photo detectors||21 megapixels|
|Sensor size||1″ (13.2 x 8.8 mm)|
|ISO||Auto, 125-12800 (expands to 80-25600)|
|White balance presets||5|
|Custom white balance||Yes (4 slots)|
|Image stabilization notes||5-axis|
|JPEG quality levels||Fine, standard|
|Optics & Focus|
|Focal length (equiv.)||25–400 mm|
|Maximum aperture||F2.8 - F4.0|
|Digital zoom||Yes (4x)|
|Normal focus range||30 cm (11.81″)|
|Macro focus range||3 cm (1.18″)|
|Number of focus points||49|
|Screen / viewfinder|
|Articulated LCD||Fully articulated|
|Minimum shutter speed||60 sec|
|Maximum shutter speed||1/16000 sec|
|Manual exposure mode||Yes|
|Subject / scene modes||Yes|
|Flash range||13.50 m (at Auto ISO)|
|External flash||Yes (via hotshoe)|
|Flash modes||Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off|
|Continuous drive||12.0 fps|
|Exposure compensation||±5 (at 1/3 EV steps)|
|AE Bracketing||±3 (3, 5, 7 frames at 1/3 EV, 1/2 EV, 1 EV steps)|
|Resolutions||3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)|
|Videography notes||4K video uses MP4 (100Mbps), 1080p/720p use AVCHD (10-28Mbps)|
|USB||USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)|
|Wireless notes||802.11b/g/n with NFC|
|Remote control||Yes (wired)|
|Battery description||DMW-BLC12PP lithium-ion battery and charger|
|Battery Life (CIPA)||360|
|Weight (inc. batteries)||831 g (1.83 lb / 29.31 oz)|
|Dimensions||137 x 99 x 131 mm (5.39 x 3.9 x 5.16″)|
Scoring is relative only to the other cameras in the same category at the time of review.
|Ergonomics & handling||
|Metering & focus accuracy||
|Image quality (raw)||
|Image quality (jpeg)||
|Low light / high ISO performance||
|Viewfinder / screen rating||
|Movie / video mode||
The Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 is a very impressive superzoom camera with an F2.8-4, 25-400mm lens and a one-inch sensor. Both photo and video quality are impressive, and support for 4K videos make the camera futureproof. The FZ1000 has a beautiful XGA EVF and a fully articulating LCD. Handling and build quality aren't perfect, but the camera's features make up for it.
Travelers who want great photo quality and a powerful, fast lens. Video enthusiasts who want to be on the cutting edge.
Not So Good For
FZ1000 Likes/Dislikes and compared to RX10.
In a nutshell the I really like the FZ1000. It is fast and responsive. The start up time is blazing fast. The image quality is what I hoped it would be. And the Auto Focus is awesome! (This is the bulk of what I want to say) The rest of this will be nit picking. I do wish the AEL/AFL button wasn't tucked up so high into the EVF area. I use that button for focus lock and exposure lock routinely and its positioning makes it very hard to use 1 handed and feel secure. The grip is great so its not ...
This is just a quick note about this camera which I have now had for about a week I will try to put together a better review later ... ( Firstly my digital camera history - Canon G1 - Nikon D70 - Nikon D80 - Nikon D7000 (w. 18-200) - Nikon V1 (w. 10-30 & 30-110) + some "compacts" (hated them all) ) and now !! (1) the Panasonic FZ 1000 To put it simply I will NOT use any of the older cameras again The FZ 1000 is SO Good and So much fun to use that I could not go back to the ...
I own this camera for a few days, so my review is based on a first impression. But that fist impression is very very good. This camera replaces my Nikon D300s with Nikon 16-85 and Tamron 70-200 F2.8 and also my Sony HX9V for movies. The Nikon was too heavy to take with me all te time so I ended op taking my Sony with me wich is a very frustrating camer, cause it has too little options and it's slòòòòw! The Panasonic is fast, very fast. It turns on fast and the focussing system is also very ...
Panasonic FZ1000 User review
This is an amazing tool for most photographers. First the 1 inch sensor, which seems to be becoming a standard in both video and still cameras that are not intro level cameras has amazing range, and is relatively clean through ISO 1600. I've been shooting 4K video this summer and I have put together a comparison video of the FZ1000, the GH4 and the Sony AX100, which uses the same sized sensor. you can see it here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-2ZedzLeZs The camera's size is perfect to ...
2 x panorama with FZ1000
a beautiful sky above my place in the Netherlands tonight (and also my first 2 panorama's with FZ1000...) greetings Ella
You got that right, Ella! Not a bad start - and you even threw in water, sky, and a flying bird, which can often be problematic for stitching and they still turned our pretty good! Continue Reading
Very beautiful shots Ella. I like the second one a little better though the details are a little softer. The camera might have focused too much on the foreground objects on the left side perhaps when you began shooting. The pano modes can be a little finicky sometimes but overall these are very enjoyable. Thanks for sharing them. -Tim Continue Reading
Question for FZ1000 users
I have a question for those of you who dumped all your DSLR/ micro four thirds gear to get the FZ1000. Right now I have a Nikon DSLR with a 16-85 VR and an Olympus EM-5 which I am using mainly with a Oly 12-40 f2.8 plus a few primes but it seems like there is always that next latest and greatest lens or body to buy and it is never ending. It is getting expensive trying to keep up I'm sure many of you can relate. I am on the verge of selling everything and making my life much simpler and settling on something like the Pansonic FZ1000 so I am asking you who own this camera just how good is the lens on this thing? Is it sharp edge to edge throughout the zoom range or does it show obvious blurring in the corners at full wide angle for example? Is CA a factor or is it pretty much non existant? I will probably be using it mostly for landscapes on a tripod with self timer so another question I have is can you set the timer once and leave it on or do you have to constantly reset it for ...
http://cameraergonomics.blogspot.com.au/2014/08/panasonic-fz1000-lens-evaluation.html I have written at length about picture quality of the FZ1000. The link above deals specifically with lens performance. In short it is excellent. You will not have any problems on that account. Just a few comments: I never use the tripod for landscapes unless light levels are very low, such as evening or night. The OIS on the FZ1000 makes the tripod redundant most of the time. A good all purpose aperture is f5. The camera can produce some CA and purple fringing at high contrast edges. These are easily dealt with in Photoshop Camera RAW (or Lightroom). You can check depth of field at various apertures with an online calculator such as DOFMaster. I have sold off all my interchangeable lens camera gear and lenses (M43) and have no regrets at all. Andrew Continue Reading
I've had more cameras than I care to think about. I've had micro four thirds, canon and Sony DSLR's, Sony Rx10 and many more. I now have the Fz1000 . It's not perfect but it is a great camera, and so much fun and that's what it's all about. Lens quality is excellent as good as I've seen from MY DSLR's. If you don't like this camera I would be shocked. Continue Reading
Hello Moonman, I downsized from DSLR to m4/3, and now to the FZ1000, and it's wonderful not to have to carry a large kit when traveling/hiking on my frequent trips to the Sierras, California. 25-400mm has been more than satisfactory for me. I haven't seen a lens yet that didn't show some CA if the conditions were right. But I haven't noticed it excessively with the FZ1000. As far as corner sharpness at the wide end, I suppose it will depend on how large you print. At 8"x10" I am satisfied. Rabbitbrush overlooking Lake at Johnsondale, Sequoia National Forest, California Panasonic has *finally* made the timer sticky by putting it on a Mode dial on the top left side. Unfortunately, you have to program it for either 2sec. or 10sec. There is also a level gauge. There are 4 Custom Modes and 5 Function Buttons. The Fn Buttons can be individually programed for each C Mode, meaning 20 possible Fn Settings. Wonderful for configuring different shooting situations and having them accessible at ... Continue Reading
Anyone here review the FZ1000 coming from a dslr?
It seems every time I read someone's comments in here on the FZ1000, they are comparing it to the FZ200, which doesn't really tell me much. Anyone shoot a dlsr, any dslr, and can compare them? The specs look intriguing, but I am trying to gauge the level of performance and quality against a modern APS-C sensor and dslr speed and focusing. Every time I go down this exploratory road with a new small sensor camera, reading praise heaped on a new camera, I eventually find the inevitable comments of, "oh, well sure, next to dslr it fails, but...". Then I wonder what all the fuss was about?
I recently sold my Nikon D7000 (I'll list lenses below so you know what I was used to). Prior to that owned a D300, D80 and also had a D4000 and D5100 sprinkled in there. The only reason for the D4000 is I won it in a photo contest and sold it and upgraded to a D5100 but eventually sold that too because I didn't need it. Just mentioning these for some context as to cameras I have shot with. Prior to all that I have owned digital cameras since Kodak introduced the DC280 (a 2.3 megapixel point and shoot). After that Kodak and before getting the D80 (first DSLR) I had maybe three or four different models of point and shoot digital cameras. I currently also own a Panasonic TS3 for rugged/waterproof fun. I apologize if this gets long, but this seemed like a good place to share my thoughts. I went with an FZ1000 for three main reasons: (1) I wanted to sell all my DSLR gear. At this point in my life I have too much money tied up in it and needed the money for other things. My preference would ... Continue Reading
I'll attempt an answer. My wife has an FZ200 and just received it's replacement....a new FZ1000. Before ordering the FZ1000, she was interested in trying an APS-C dslr. So we bought the latest Sigma 18-250mm OS Macro lens for a test on my Nikon D7100. After less than a day, it was an easy decision. The Sigma will be sold. We quickly decided to order the FZ1000. The FZ1000 simply has a much better lens, particularly as the Sigma nears 135mm... At 250mm (400mm equiv) it was simply not sharp at all, even at F8, where the FZ1000 is great at F4. The FZ1000 is just superior at full telephoto vs the Sigma at full telephoto (on the very good 24mp D7100, and with the Sigma stopped down to F8).....i.e. both at the same 400mm equivalent focal length. As for the bokeh, an APS-C setup will generally be some better. Certainly not a deal-breaker. There may be a superzoom lens out there that will level the playing field. It wasn't that Sigma, nor the Tamron 18-270mm, (nor 14-140mm Panasonic lens on ... Continue Reading
It also occurred to me to look at the DXO site at sensor quality of the FZ1000 vs DSLRs. http://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Ratings Assuming that it is the most recent 1" Sony sensor in the FZ1000, there are 90 DSLRS and m4/3 cameras with sensors which are currently ranked below the one used in the Panny. For example, the Nikon D3100 and D300 both get the same rating. If, not so long ago, someone had offerred me a bridge camera, with 25-400 mm f4 Leica zoom, top quality video, bright EVF, fast accurate AF and image quality of a D300m, I'd have snatched their hand off :-D Continue Reading