Sigma’s 70-300mm F4-5.6 DG Macro is a budget telephoto zoom lens. With a range that is useful for candid portraiture, capturing children playing in the backyard, amateur sports or even wildlife at the zoo, it’s great on vacation for capturing scenic details or even groups of flowers in a garden. The Sigma 70-300mm offers a 4X zoom ratio in a compact lens that is easily carried in your camera bag or left on the camera as you travel.
Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro Telephoto Zoom Lens
Already own this?
This item is in your gearlist!
- 70-300mm focal length
- 105-450mm equivalent focal length on APS-C cameras, 112-480mm equivalent focal length on Canon APS-C cameras
- F4-5.6 maximum aperture; F22-32 minimum
- Micromotor-type AF motor without full-time manual focusing
- 58mm filters
- 0.95m/37.40" minimum focus
- Available in Canon EF, Pentax KAF, Sony Alpha, Sigma SA, Nikon F (FX) mounts
|Lens type||Zoom lens|
|Max Format size||35mm FF|
|Focal length||70–300 mm|
|Lens mount||Canon EF, Nikon F (FX), Pentax KAF, Sigma SA Bayonet, Sony/Minolta Alpha|
|Maximum aperture||F4.0 - F5.6|
|Minimum aperture||F22.0 - F32.0|
|Number of diaphragm blades||9|
|Special elements / coatings||1 SLD glass element|
|Minimum focus||0.95 m (37.4″)|
|Full time manual||No|
|Focus method||Extending front|
|Focus notes||Switch allows close-up focusing in the 200-300mm focal lengthrange|
|Weight||550 g (1.21 lb)|
|Diameter||77 mm (3.02″)|
|Length||122 mm (4.8″)|
|Zoom method||Rotary (extending)|
|Filter thread||58 mm|
|Filter notes||rotates on focusing|
Sigma 70-300 F4-5.6 DG / Makro
I used this lense a long time ago with the analog camera F90 (N90 in US) Nikon. And I was quiet happy with it. Now, with the new Nikon D800, I was very suprised about the quality, speed, autofocus, sharpness (even in the edges), also when the light conditions are poor.
Sigma 70-300mm DG
I purchased this lens in frustration at my low end Canon lens not doing the job . I was surprised how good this lens is for the price i paid for it . It feels nice to use it focuses fast and it is sharp too so much better than the Canon lens i replaced . Problems: None
Very soft at 200-300mm, slow but precise autofocus
If your objective is to get a telephoto zoom for the lowest price possible then this lens is great for its price (I got it for about 110e or $140). The value you get is surely more than the price you pay for it. At 70-100mm this lens is sufficiently sharp for casual photography but at 200mm and 300mm its sharpness drops to unacceptable levels for me. However the biggest problem for me is its slow autofocus but it's nevertheless correct and precise. The color I get from this lens is worse ...
Sigma 70-300 f/4-5.6 DG Macro manual aperture?
Does the lens above have manual aperture? I mean the little lever (or something like that) that you can push to adjust the aperture. I have one but I am not really sure how to find out, because I don't seem to see it anywhere. So I am asking you, professionals, I would like to buy extension tube for macro photography but I don't want to pay an arm and a leg for electrical models.
AFAIK all lenses that allow you to set the aperture on the lens do so using a ring. Your lens will have a ring for zooming and a ring for manual focusing. If there is a third ring then that will be for adjusting the aperture and there will be aperture markings next to it. I think that it is extremely unlikely that your lens has an aperture ring but check it. Very few modern lenses have an aperture ring except those made by companies like Zeiss, Leica, Samyang and a few others. Old DSLR lenses have aperture rings. Continue Reading
It probably depends on the model those Sigma 70-300 zooms seem to have gone through a lot of incarnations. Mine is a Nikon mount D, rather than a DG (the G might well be significant) and has an aperture ring at the camera end -- you can see the aperture markings here. I would not try to use extension rings with a long zoom like this -- you'd need a lot of extension to get any worthwhile extra magnification and it's quite likely that IQ would fall to pieces by the time you get to 1:1. To the OP: Given your apparent level of experience I'd suggest using a decent close-up lens like a Raynox 150 or 250 instead. I'll post a couple of examples after lunch! Continue Reading
Hello, as I wrote above, I have got the Nikon model without aperture ring, but I already solved out how to manually open the lever (more info above). Also thanks for the close-up lens, I am already ordering these close-up filters, can I combine them together? And if it is possible, are there some cheaper models? I looked up something on amazon, or dealextreme, but I am not sure if it won't totally loose all sharpness etc. It doesn't have to be perfect image quality since I am photography beginner, but I also don't want something that will look like from 90's camera. Sorry for possible grammar mistakes in all my text above, english isn't my native language and I just woke up, so my mind also isn't at it's best haha. Continue Reading
What magnification can I achieve with +1+2+4+10 filters mounted together on my Sigma 70-300 (1:2)?
I hope this is the right forum since the filters are for macro macro photography :-D I would like to achieve 1:1 or even better, should I try this combo, or buy some macro lens like Nikkor 40mm f/2.8 G AF-S DX Micro?
Hi, I would just try out what you have already and see what you think you need to do what you want. In my opinion it is too much work playing around with a load of close up lenses/filters and I can't see the results being what you are after. It might be an option to look for a Tamron Adaptall lens on Ebay and buy an adapter for your Nikon to fit it. You will have to go manual but for close ups / Macro you would probably want to focus manually anyway. Tamron SP Adaptall lenses are really good and are not too expensive to buy on Ebay. I post a couple of pics for you, one from my Sigma 70 - 300mm lens and the other from my Tamron Adaptall 90mm f2.8 Macro 1:1 72b. Best of luck. Cheers. Sigma 70-300mm Tamron SP 90mm f2.8 (handheld) Cheers again. Continue Reading
Together that's +17 diopters (59mm). You should get quite some way over 1:1 at 300mm. Mind DoF will be thinner than paper, and the quality won't be good. Achromat close-ups are better, but only available in lower diopters. A +3 (Marumi DHG achromat 330) should already get you to 1:1 at the long end (with a working distance of ca 30cm). ... for more magnification, +4 Canon 250D ... +5 Marumi 200 ... +8 Raynox DCR-250 (the diameter is 43mm only, might vignette). The micro 40mm will produce better quality. Will do up to 1:1 just by focusing close, or some more on extension tubes. But the working distances will be short (bugs and snakes...). Continue Reading
First of all, thanks for all the info you gave me! The lens has minimal focusing distance of 0.95 meters (37 inches) which is kind of long distance, and if I am correct close up filters shorten the min focusing distance, or do they work like magnifier? I have been thinking about the 40mm because I take macros mostly only of static objects, but it is another investment (around 250€ in my country and used ones are being listed even more expensive or if they are from another country the shipping cost is being way too high). I have big, big dillema here :-) So do you recommend me to invest in the micro lens or stay with the sigma untill I have more experience with macro? (I am photographing only for 3 months, but I learn it daily and I truely love it) I (maybe unfortunately) ordered 20€ ones from Dealextreme, they have excellent rating, and should arrive in next few days. Also sorry for my bad English, not my native language + I just woke up and I am ill so my brain isn't working the ... Continue Reading
0.45x extender breaks focus in Sigma 70-300mm DG Macro
[Feel free to move the thread if appropriate.] Let's not go into the story of how I came to own these two items yesterday, as it wasn't by choice and was a lengthy, painful and expensive experience. However, once they came into my possession I thought that I would attempt to make the best of a bad situation and try them out. Long story short, I put the extender onto the lens just to play with it, found focus and took a couple of test shots, then unscrewed the extender and tried to use the lens on its own again. However, now the main lens won't focus on anything at all and seems to have decided that it has a different focal length. Manual focusing achieves nothing, and the focal indicators on the barrel seem to be in the same place, so I don't know how or why the focus has shifted. The only way the lens will focus now is with the extender on the end of it, but the glass in there is even worse than in the main lens. Does anyone know the likely cause behind this or how I might be able ...
Have your own question?
"Beginning July 1, 2013, all brand new Sigma Products purchased from authorized Sigma dealers are covered under the 1 year America warranty (North and South America) and U.S.A. extended warranties for a period of three (3) years against defects in manufacturing and workmanship only. Your warranty period begins the day you purchase your Sigma camera, lens and/or flash and runs for a total period of four years from that date (please refer to the warranty policy included with your product)."