The Sony NEX-3N is Sony's entry-level NEX camera, replacing the NEX-F3. The 3N is, as before, aimed at users stepping up from compact cameras and gains a compact-style zoom lever around its shutter button. It features a smaller body than the F3, and Sony says it is the smallest, lightest mirrorless camera to feature an APS-C sensor, despite featuring a built-in flash.
Sony NEX-3N Mirrorless Camera Kit with PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Lens
Already own this?
This item is in your gearlist!
- 16.1MP CMOS sensor
- ISO 100-16,000
- 3 inch 180°-tilting LCD with 460,000 dots
- 1080p/60i/24p HD video recording (AVCHD)
- 4 frames per second continuous shooting
- Zoom lever allows one-handed operation and smooth zoom
- Built-in flash
- Auto Object Framing, Face Detection, Tracking AF, and Picture Effects
- Superior Auto and Anti-Motion Blur modes plus PSAM and Sweep Panorama
|Body type||Rangefinder-style mirrorless|
|Max resolution||4912 x 3264|
|Other resolutions||4912 x 2760, 3568 x 2368, 3568 x 2000, 2448 x 1624, 2448 x 1376|
|Image ratio w:h||3:2, 16:9|
|Effective pixels||16 megapixels|
|Sensor photo detectors||17 megapixels|
|Sensor size||APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm)|
|ISO||Auto, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200, 6400, 12800, 16000|
|White balance presets||6|
|Custom white balance||Yes (2500-9900k )|
|JPEG quality levels||Fine, Standard|
|Optics & Focus|
|Number of focus points||25|
|Lens mount||Sony E|
|Focal length multiplier||1.5×|
|Screen / viewfinder|
|Manual exposure mode||Yes|
|Subject / scene modes||Yes|
|Built-in flash||Yes (Pop-up)|
|External flash||No (Accessory Port)|
|Continuous drive||4 fps|
|Resolutions||1920 x 1080|
|Storage types||SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo|
|USB||USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)|
|HDMI||Yes (Type D)|
|Battery description||Lithium-Ion NP-FW50 rechargeable battery & USB charger|
|Battery Life (CIPA)||480|
|Weight (inc. batteries)||269 g (0.59 lb / 9.49 oz)|
|Dimensions||110 x 62 x 35 mm (4.33 x 2.44 x 1.38″)|
NEX learning curve notwithstanding....
My first NEX, and am very pleased with it so far. Found the menus a little confusingly laid out at first, so there's a learning curve here - Not fuji-levels of obscure, but a different mind-set was used...maybe a little too dumbed down? Hard to describe. Anyhoo there's definitely a learning curve involved, but once you get their way of thinking, everything's fine. Also had scarily bad experience with the flash at first - No deliberately crazy settings or difficult scenes to try and throw ...
Great camera for price
My first NEX series camera was Nex-5n and I was very happy with it because of video and high iso capabilities. Then NEX-6 was announced and I sold my nex-5n, because I wanted to go for EVF and 16-50 oss power zoom. I started to wait for some price drops, and then nex-3n has been announced. And then it was easy to decide. Why go for nex-6, if I can get same image quality and lens for half price? Yes, NEX-3n is slower than 5n, and don't have 10fps burst, but thats not so noticeable in real life ...
Sony Nex-3N: Great value-for-money camera
This is my first Nex Camera. I currently own the Sony A35 and Canon G11. This is also my first online review about a camera. So what prompted me to give a review? Simple; this is an underrated camera that deserves a lot more attention! Some complain it is too small, and amazingly it is! It is an engineering feat considering there’s a APS-C sensor inside. In my opinion, with the rubber grip the handling is good, in fact it is much better than most other compact and micro four third camera I tried.
Small but amazing
Hi all,One of my hobbies is photography. I'm an amateur for this subject. This is my first NEX camera and first mirror less camera too. I have used Sony HX 100v for a long time and I decided to go for an advanced model. I had lot of financial constraints and I was really concerned about the money I was going to spend. Fortunately I found this handy camera at a reasonable price. At the first sight I fell into love with this camera. It was small and I was suited my purposes. I go cycling for ...
Is this a normal noise level for NEX-3N video?
I got an NEX-3n a couple of months ago, mainly for doing basic video stuff, and there seems to be a ton of noise when shooting in low light, even at low ISO's. I took a couple of really quick video shots in my dark basement. These are all shot at ISO 200, 1920x1080, AVCHD: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bouK8gdPpto Still photos shot in the same setting have very low noise in comparison. Is this just a fact of recording video in such terrible lighting?
What you are seeing is not noise. You are seeing the macroblocking artifacts caused by the avchd compression. For effeciency, the codec compresses dark areas very heavily. You have four options: 1 - Use a higher iso. Yes it kind of defeats the purpose of what you want to do, but you need to feed the codec more light so it won't compress as much. 2 - Provide artificial lighting and then bring down the levels in post. This is what most people/studios do. Though again this is probably not an option for unplanned or basic shooting. 3 - Use HDMI out and a recorder. The recorder, like an atmos ninja, will instead record a video file from the clean HDMI live feed. The encoders on the external recorder will probably have better recording formats and nitrates to choose from. 4 - Use DRO. While DRO has no real benefit over manipulating a raw image, it has one very special trick up its sleeve for video. A DRO of level 5 can brighten the dark areas significantly, -before- it gets sent to the ... Continue Reading
I don't think NEX-3N offers clean HDMI output. Would have been nice though. I think only A6000, A5100 support it. Continue Reading
Camera for photographing rock climbing: TZ60, FZ72, NEX-3N, A3000, LX7
Hi all, I am trying to find a camera to use when I go on travels for climbing/travel. I used to have an Olympus XZ-1, as was very happy with it, but it got stolen. So now I am looking for a new one. I am on a limited budget, and have suggested the below cameras as I know I can afford them. TZ60, FZ72, NEX-3N (with 16-50mm), A3000 (with 18-55)mm, LX7. While reading climbing blogs, I've noticed that alot of people recommend having some wide angle and zoom capabilities, which is why I've included the FZ72. A friend of mine is very happy with her LX7 when taking pictures of people climbing, so that's why its in the bunch. And RAW is necessary as well. The two mirrorless cameras are in the bunch because I've heard that it might be nice to have an option of changing lenses. However, I will not do that yet because of a limited budget. The TZ60 is known for being a good camera for travellers. Any suggestions or tips? Or if there are others in the same price range which offer a good wide ...
I would not recommend the Sony a3000 for rugged outdoor activities like rock climbing. It's just a wee plastic lad, doesn't have weather proofing, and is egg shell like. It's a great camera I use, but taking it along where a good beating could easily occur? Well, I guess it's cheap and better than breaking a $3000 body so in that sense it is almost a disposable as you could buy 10 a3000's to one A7r .... so maybe a couple of climbs you get lucky and nothing gets broke? I'd still want a more solid frame although lightweight is a solid forte of the a3000 sturdy is not..... Continue Reading
I can really recommend the nikon AW1. It's mirrorless. Underwater secured but the best feature is that it's very easy to handle with one hand. Also it's very fast focusing and shoots extremely rapid for a camera in that class, even in raw. And it's the most rugged mirrorless. Continue Reading
Upgrading to Sony NEX 3N...worth it?
Hi Guys, A keen beginner here looking for some advice. I have had a Sony DSC-HX5 for around 3 years now as an all round point and shoot which has served me well. Looking to upgrade to a low end CSC and the Sony NEX 3N seems to fit the bill. Going on honeymoon in a week to Italy where the opportunity for some stunning photos is going to come up so need to make a decision. Ultimately looking for some advice from more experienced peeps if its worth it or stick with the HX5 for this once in a lifetime holiday? Cheers!
I would. The sensor on the 3N is so much larger and better. You will get much better results under all lighting conditions especially lower light. With current pricing, they are a steal. Continue Reading
From a hardware point of view you might get a better camera, you can add more and better lenses to the Nex in the future. So from there it is good to have a Nex camera, as low light IQ will be better. But will you make better p7ctures with it? That depends on how quick you will understand the different DOF and handling of the Nex. When going on you trip you want the best pictures you can get and the camera is just a small part of the story. You knowing how your camera works and reacts in different sytuations is maybe more important so here some tips 1. Capture has a very good point about the Nex 5r, it is a better camerak but not realy harder to use, in many ways even easier! 2. The Nex will need an extra tele lens when you want the same reach as your compact, so invest in that too 3. take your compact with you too on the trip, especialy when you do not buy the telelens (55-210 or 18-200mm), but it is wise to have both cameras, sonyou can take all the pictures you want... Have fun ... Continue Reading
I have a NEX-3n and an RX100 and I like both. The 3n sensor is as good as any, and the built-in flash is nice (hold it back with your finger and you get bounce flash). The image quality with the kit 16-50 is very good but not really better than the RX100, which has a better lens. Coming from the HX5, do you use telephoto a lot? The 3n with kit lens goes to 75mm (35mm equivalent) and the HX5 goes to 250mm. Maybe you would still take the HX5 along... Continue Reading
Have your own question?
- Sony Alpha NEX-3N camera body
- PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Lens (SELP1650)
- Lens cap
- Rechargeable battery (NP-FW50)
- AC adaptor (AC-UB10)
- Shoulder strap
- Body cap
- Micro USB cable