The 16MP Sony NEX-5T is marginally updated from its predecessor, with the addition of NFC connectivity. It has a control dial, dedicated function button and the ability to run proprietary in-camera apps to extend its capabilities. It retains its predecessor's live view focusing technology, using a modified sensor with pixels devoted to performing phase-detection to provide a hybrid autofocus system. The phase-detection pixels are used to determine depth information about the focus target, which means the camera has to perform less hunting. Other key features includes its 180° tilt-able touch-screen LCD for easy self-portraits, DSLR-like AF tracking for shooting at up to 10 fps, one-touch sharing, and one-touch remote (for NFC-enabled devices).
Sony NEX-5T Mirrorless Camera
Already own this?
This item is in your gearlist!
- 16MP APS-C format CMOS sensor
- Fast Hybrid AF includes phase-detection for DSLR-like focus
- Up to 10 fps shooting speed
- ISO 100-25600
- 3" tilting touch-LCD with 920,000 dots
- Full 1080 HD movie shooting at 60p/24p with full exposure control
- Simple connectivity to smartphones via Wi-Fi or NFC
- One-touch sharing: Directly transfers a still image or movie to an NFC enabled Android smartphone or tablet with a single touch.
- One-touch remote: Activates Smart Remote Control and links the camera with a smartphone or tablet by simply touching the devices while in a shooting mode
- Optional electronic viewfinder
Upgrading Lens Firmware using A6000
Hi everyone, Just got the A6000, love it but my lenses (24mm 1.8 Zeiss & 55-210mm lens) are still on version 0.1 Firmware. I went to update them but it specifically says; (1) This firmware update can only be performed when the lens is attached to the following cameras: NEX-5R, NEX-5T or NEX-6. - You cannot perform the firmware update using other camera. Do you think its safe to try them with the A6000? I'm assuming they just haven't updated the document as these updates came out about 6 months ago. Just obviously don't want to do any damage! Thanks. http://www.sony.co.uk/support/en/content/cnt-dwnl/prd-dime/sony-sel-firmware-update-ver02-mac/SEL55210
NEX 5R to RX10
I'm going around in circles reading reviews and opinions on the RX10 and I'm getting increasingly confused. Many positive reviews are followed by negative comments from 'enthusiasts'. I have an NEX5R with both the 16mm prime and 18-55mm standard kit lenses, which I am satisfied with in terms of quality (I'm primarily a point and shooter with an artistic eye), but I'm frustrated by the control system and lack of a viewfinder. Will an RX10 deliver similar/better/worse quality that my standard NEX kit? I understand that the lens is in a different league, but I like the quality of my large sensor. I use my camera for all sorts of images...travel, architecture, wildlife, family etc etc. Are there any previous NEX users out there that are now using the RX10? Any advice would be gratefully received. Scott.
Nikon V1 as a wildlife camera?
Hi I've been using my NEX-5R with 70-400 recently for wildlife shots - most of which need a lot of cropping. Optical quality is reasonably good but the body is not designed for this type of work and so buffer depth and other handling apects are frustrating I had been thinking of getting a Sony SLT-A77 (though the high ISO noise worries me) but the Nikon 1 V1 is going for a crazy-cheap price locally and I have a rather nice Pentax F*300/4.5 lens which I wonder about using on it via an Ebay adaptor - this would certainly be a cheaper option than the A77, but would it be a realistic one? Specs for the V1 seem exciting (able to take photos and videos at the same time) but I see that it doesn't have focus peaking and people complain about the image magnification for MF. I would be buying just the body and kit 10-30 lens, and am not interested in buying any Nikon telephoto lenses to go with it 1. Will a cropped bird image on the V1 be similar, superior or inferior to a similarly cropped ...
Here is a set on Flickr showing some shots I have taken with the Nikon 70-300 VR lens on my V1 with the FT1 adapter: http://www.flickr.com/photos/thekrankis/sets/72157637421120234/ I you decide to go the Nikon 1 route I would advise using Nikon lenses, since the recent firmware update many third party lenses that used to work with the FT1 now do not. The 70-300 VR that I use is an affordable starting place and gives an equivalent 190-810 reach. The 300 f4 lens is popular and gives superb results. Also the 70-200 f4 and the 70-200 f2.8 lenses perform very well - the f4 is probably more suitable simply because it is smaller and lighter. Have fun whatever you decide! Continue Reading
Yes, here is one taken with the V1 and a Nikon 300f4 (with 1.4TC). I think the goal with the V1 is to NOT crop. IQ isn't going to be as good as that from larger, recent sensors. The 2.7x crop factor, coupled with ability to do (accurate) central-point autofocus makes the V1 and V2 uniquely capable for doing certain wildlife shots. Namely those with a) decent to bright light and b) non-moving subjects. This thumbnail shot is uncropped: Nikon V1, FT-1 adapter, Nikon 300F4 AF-S with Nikon 1.4 TC. Here is a link to the large size version of the above: http://www.cjcphoto.net/lenstests/v1/images/130306-175446-00-2448-1%20v1.jpg Here is the same bird, without the 1.4TC (bare 300mm lens) but cropped in to about the same composition as the above so you can compare with and without the TC: http://www.cjcphoto.net/lenstests/v1/images/130306-175651-00-2458-1%20v1-crop.jpg The problem with moving subjects is twofold. First, you have only a single (largish) central autofocus point/area. If ... Continue Reading
The V2 has a 60fps mode. I've been shooting him for 5 years now. I suspect he'll be out there again in a week or so, if not already. (This pair of owls returns to the same nest near my house every year). Hmm. I don't know that I would say that. I did, of course, have more pixels on the owl with the TC than without, so there is some advantage in that. But any difference you see may well be more due to post-processing than anything else. You can take photos at the same time, though they are lower resolution JPG's, as far as I know. I don't have any convenient way of posting videos, except in Facebook. Last spring I shot several videos of the owls (3 chicks and one adult in the nest until they got too big). I did it mostly for the grandchildren to see the chicks getting larger each week. I hardly ever do video, except underwater, but the experience brought home to me the possibility of using crop factor reach in a way that you can't match with a D800e, or D7100. If you have Facebook, ... Continue Reading